Dangerous Stereotypes: The Alpha Male

I’m going to tackle some stereotypes present in modern fiction that I think are dangerous when used irresponsibly.  Any entries part of this series will be labeled as “Dangerous Stereotypes.” You can read previous entries in this series, which discuss the Scientist and Bad Boy stereotypes.

Click HERE for the Audio Edition!

Every culture has certain expectations of how people are supposed to behave. Sometimes these social rules apply across the board, but others are gender-specific, and this is reflected in our media. While a lot of scrutiny is given to the short stick that women get instead of proper representation in books, films, and video games, less attention has been paid to the toxic masculinity that pervades so much modern media.

John Carter of Mars carrying Princess Dejah Thoris

When you picture the hero of a story, especially in science fiction or fantasy, what do you see? Chances are the kind of man that comes to mind is tall, physically fit or imposing, and who can win a fight with style, even if violence isn’t their first choice. Many are handsome, cocky, reckless, often abrasive, and tend to fill the leadership role with a sense of natural ease. They are almost always heterosexual playboys, exuding a charisma that draws women to their bed and encourages other men to either follow their lead or to become their competitor. Some prime examples of this archetype can be found in Captain Kirk from Star Trek, John Carter from the Barsoom novels by Edgar Rice Burroughs, any incarnation of James Bond, the half-demon Inuyasha from the manga by Rumiko Takahashi, and mythic idols like Thor and Robin Hood. Even heroes who start off shy, awkward, nerdy, or reluctant, like Harry Potter and Peter Parker, eventually become independent leaders and warriors thanks to their adventures. Expressions of emotion, empathy, or sensitivity are often shown as weaknesses to be hidden behind a wall of witty banter, arrogance, or stoicism. It is the stereotypical “Alpha Male” who always comes out on top.

Now, I’m not saying that we should never have these kinds of characters, nor that they are all uninteresting, muscle-bound hoodlums. I enjoy much of the media that features this kind of hero, and there is room for some variety in their motivations and the actions that follow. While there are times and stories that require or work best with an Alpha hero, it does severely limit the examples of male behavior to the macho Übermensch. A man who does not fit this rather narrow band of accepted behavior is often ridiculed or ostracized, both in fiction and in real life. How often have we heard a quieter, thoughtful, more sensitive man or boy be labeled a “pansy,” a “chicken,” or a “wimp”? How often have they been told that they should “toughen up” lest they “lose their man-card”?

The thing is, men are not all the same. They don’t have identical interests, abilities, inclinations, or personalities. But rather than celebrating these differences or deviations from the stereotypical hero, they are criticized or regulated to sidekicks for the leading Alpha. Turned into a one-trick pony, they rarely have an opportunity to showcase the many different and viable forms of masculinity open for men to explore. The Alpha gets all the accolades while the Beta becomes the butt of the joke. This can lead men who don’t fit into the stereotype to become depressed, insecure, express misplaced anger, or engage in unnecessarily risky behaviors. Having a single, almost impossible standard  like the fictional Alpha male is both unrealistic and dangerous.

It’s rare to find a character that successfully shakes off this toxic depiction of masculinity while remaining the hero of the story. The biggest current mainstream example would be Newt Scamander, the socially awkward but dedicated and passionate hero of the movie Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. This entry was actually inspired by a Youtube video about him “The Fantastic Masculinity of Newt Scamander” posted by Pop Culture Detective, and I highly recommend watching it. (Many thanks to David Greenshell for bringing it to my attention!)

Newt Scamander & Jacob Kowalski with Pickett the Bowtruckle


Newt is a huge departure from the traditional fantasy hero, with empathy presented as his greatest strength rather than a liability. He doesn’t fight, he doesn’t have a special destiny, and he isn’t really charismatic. He’s just a quiet, gentle, confidant person whose sympathy and compassion encompasses both magical creatures and humans.

I’m wracking my brains trying to think of other male heroes who are of a similar atypical mold, and (while I’m sure there must be more) the only ones that come to mind that are close are Lief from Deltora Quest or Rowan of Rin by Emily Rodda and Bilbo Baggins from The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien. They have empathy for others and generally survive by their wits and compassion rather than with brute force or special powers. While they try to be strong and do learn to fight to some degree, they often openly admit that they are scared, out of their depth, or need help. It isn’t a perfect parallel, but at least it gives a little more variety to the heroic palate.

As writers and artists, we need to be aware of these pervasive stereotypes about male behavior and try to have characters that express a wider range of strengths, personalities, and inclinations. The idea of the Alpha male being the only ideal excludes so many positive traits that can lead to even more varied and interesting stories! Men need to see that having and expressing emotion is not a weakness. That being sensitive, caring, and nurturing is not emasculating. That having interests or talents that don’t require violence or mastery of martial arts is admirable. That valuing diplomacy and compromise should be lauded, not derided. We need to see fewer Alphas and more Betas.

9 thoughts on “Dangerous Stereotypes: The Alpha Male

  1. I totally agree! And our portrayal of a what makes a strong woman needs work as well (obviously). But generally speaking, a “strong female protagonist” is a woman who embodies typical male qualities, such as physical strength or cut-throat wit. Rarely do I see a woman, say a nurturing, single mother showcased on-screen. So we still need to work on displaying different aspects of strength on screen.

    Did I go on a tangent again? Damn hah

    1. Absolutely right. There does need to be a wider range of what constitutes a “strong” woman as well. I wanted to tackle the portrayal of men this time because I feel like there is a lot of talk about the need for positive representations of women on screen, but far less about doing the same for men.

      Thanks for the comment and the follow! Glad you enjoyed the entry!

  2. I know a person who calls any and all men who are not “alphas” (itself a problematic label) bitch boys. When I tried to tell him that he was insulting most men (in life, not in fiction), it would lead to terrible arguments.

    I can name very few man I know in real life who could be described as “alpha.” The few I know are, honestly, terrible people. Highly… well, toxic, for lack of a better word.

    1. That is really sad. The stereotypical “alpha” (you’re right, a problematic term, but I lack a better one) is held up as an ideal, but I don’t see much ideal about it. In fiction it can be fun and engaging, but in real life, like you said, they tend to be very toxic people. It’s their way or the highway, so prepare to be run over.

      Thanks for reading, commenting, and sharing! Glad you found this entry interesting!

      1. Some modern fiction is doing a wonderful job at showing alpha males as they would be in life. Their unyeilding and selfish behavior ends up damaging the people in their lives and leads to them being alone and angry about it. Shows like Mad Men abd Breaking Bad come to mind. I like that. It’s sort of a deconstruction in that it plays the type with no illusions.

  3. I’d like to see the words Alpha and Beta removed from the description of people all together. These are boxes in which we put men and women. Language is so very important to creating our realities.

    1. I agree that it would probably be much better to not have those descriptors, especially since they imply a certain hierarchy. Hopefully as the human species matures, we’ll be able to move away from putting ourselves and others in boxes… although it will be a long struggle against tribalism.

      Thank you very much for reading and commenting!

  4. This article is bad. Bad. Innocent alpha males are innocent alpha males. You wouldn’t know an alpha male if you saw one because alpha males are chameleons (aka whatever I say they are / whatever I think I am).

    If I knew what your FB was, I would harass you over it. Because I am an alpha male that exerts my alpha pride by harassing women over the Internet. I also have a gun because I am so alpha. I could totally protect my family without a gun because I’m so alpha and tough but I need a gun because alphas need guns and I am alpha.

    Hear me roar!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.